Attorneys Mike Smith and Rachelle Miller recently secured dismissal of a claim for damages for their client under the recent ruling in Cleveland v Hath which requires Trial Courts to grant a motion for summary disposition when the opposing party fails to respond. Cleveland determined that Trial Courts “must” dismiss the case when the opposing party fails to present any evidence in response to a motion for summary disposition “unless the moving party’s motion failed to present a credible argument.” Id. This is a great win for our client, and Cleveland will be a useful tool going forward!
We are proud to share that our colleague, Abigail Wasil, has been nominated for the…
Our clients, an owner and operator of a manufactured home community, were sued under the…
A team effort at Cardelli Lanfear on this one! Carl Lanfear, Michael Smith, Anthony Caffrey…
Jason Newman and Justin Gonzales win another Motion for Summary Disposition. They obtained a dismissal…
Effective January 1, 2025, major amendments to Michigan Court Rule 8.126 have overhauled the pro…
Attorneys Justin Gonzales and Jason Newman obtained summary disposition for their client on a premises…