Attorneys Mike Smith and Rachelle Miller recently secured dismissal of a claim for damages for their client under the recent ruling in Cleveland v Hath which requires Trial Courts to grant a motion for summary disposition when the opposing party fails to respond. Cleveland determined that Trial Courts “must” dismiss the case when the opposing party fails to present any evidence in response to a motion for summary disposition “unless the moving party’s motion failed to present a credible argument.” Id. This is a great win for our client, and Cleveland will be a useful tool going forward!
We’re thrilled to spotlight our very own Jason Newman, recently featured in a Primerus attorney…
We are proud to be recognized in the 2025 edition of Best Law Firms®, achieving rankings…
As winter inevitably descends on Michigan, bringing with it the usual mix of wind, snow,…
Attorneys Justin Gonzales and Carl Lanfear obtained summary disposition on a claim alleging: Defamation Libel,…
We are pleased to announce that 2 lawyers have been included in the 2025 edition…
Attorneys Michael Smith and Justin Gonzales recently obtained summary disposition in a third-party auto accident…