Commerical entities are always interested in knowing whether contractual provisions will actually be enforced by courts. A Cardelli Lanfear client recently faced this very issue with respect to a forum selection clause in a commercial contract. The ultimate issue was whether any crossclaims against our client would have to be litigated in the State of Ohio, where our client had commenced litigation, or whether the merits of these crossclaims, if any, could be separately brought in Michigan. In a well-written and well-reasoned opinion, the trial court agreed with our arguments for enforcing the forum selection clause (and rejected our adversaries’ arguments against the clause), dismissing the crossclaims filed in Michigan. See Opinion & Order. We are pleased to report that the trial court enforced this forum selection clause on behalf our client.
A team effort at Cardelli Lanfear on this one! Carl Lanfear, Michael Smith, Anthony Caffrey…
Jason Newman and Justin Gonzales win another Motion for Summary Disposition. They obtained a dismissal…
Effective January 1, 2025, major amendments to Michigan Court Rule 8.126 have overhauled the pro…
Attorneys Justin Gonzales and Jason Newman obtained summary disposition for their client on a premises…
This holiday season, our firm is proud to host a toy drive in partnership with…
We’re thrilled to spotlight our very own Jason Newman, recently featured in a Primerus attorney…