Commerical entities are always interested in knowing whether contractual provisions will actually be enforced by courts. A Cardelli Lanfear client recently faced this very issue with respect to a forum selection clause in a commercial contract. The ultimate issue was whether any crossclaims against our client would have to be litigated in the State of Ohio, where our client had commenced litigation, or whether the merits of these crossclaims, if any, could be separately brought in Michigan. In a well-written and well-reasoned opinion, the trial court agreed with our arguments for enforcing the forum selection clause (and rejected our adversaries’ arguments against the clause), dismissing the crossclaims filed in Michigan. See Opinion & Order. We are pleased to report that the trial court enforced this forum selection clause on behalf our client.
Trial Victory Alert! The Cardelli Lanfear team led by Partner Carl Lanfear obtained a No Cause…
We are proud to share a recent victory at the Michigan Court of Appeals on…
Congratulations to attorney Bob Kaatz who recently won a motion for summary disposition in a…
Attorneys Mike Smith and Mackenzie Burrell obtained summary disposition in a premises liability claim. The…
We’re honored to be included in the 2026 Best Law Firms® rankings, recognized in the…
Jason Newman and Mackenzie Burrell obtained summary disposition for their client, a global machinery servicer.…